fbpx

Student Perceptions of Safe Routes to School

We met with a group of six students from North Division over a three week period during the school’s Wednesday night twilight programming. Our objective was to see if students were willing to share and document their concerns around getting to and from the North Division to attend both school and the twilight program, which runs from 6:30 to 9:00 PM.

Staff from the twilight program sat in on each session.

Over the course of our discussions, the students noted a number of situations where they feel less safe:

  • For the girls in the group, having men they did not know call out to them as they walk down the street was un-nerving. This was particularly true with older men who had been drinking, since the girls did not know “what they were up to”.
  • Cars often speed through intersections while they are trying to cross the street. This issue is even more of a concern on heavily trafficked streets.
  • They associate cars driving slowly down the block with possible drive-by shooters
  • Students feel less safe being out at night
  • Students feel less safe when they are alone
  • Students fear getting jumped by other people they see on their way to or from school
  • Though less of a problem now, they feared being victims of the point-out/knock-out game
  • Students feel less safe when walking down a block where there has been a drive-by shooting and will tend to avoid it for two to four weeks afterwards
  • Students fear getting robbed on a city bus, or as soon as they exit the bus
  • Students fear walking down streets where they see people they do not trust.
  • Girls in the group felt safer if a boy was walking with them.
  • Students don’t trust that if they were hurt on their walk that anyone would come to their aid.
  • Students don’t count on the police to be able to help or trust asking them for help.
  • Students have the experience that ambulances are not in a hurry to travel to an incident scene in their neighborhood. They equate this with a lower chance of survival should something happen to them.

Students also identified a number of situations that help them feel safer on the journey to/from school:

  • Having a house or store within running distance (one to two blocks) where they know someone provides a greater sense that they could find help. A store where they do not have a relationship with the owner or an employee does not provide a sense of safety.
  • Walking with a one or more other students provides a greater sense of safety
  • Having a backup route in mind that allows the student to avoid a risk they see on their current path provides a greater feeling of safety than cases where they they need to take a different route but don’t know what they will find there.
  • Students feel safer when there are others coming to or leaving school at the same time.
  • Students described the greatest feeling of safety when riding in a school bus or van. In their experience, a staff person (in addition to the bus driver) would be on board to ensure students weren’t hassled. They described riding in a school shuttle with friends, as fun– they felt safe being off the street and were able to relax.

 

Students avoid engaging with adults they don’t know who call out to them as they walk to or from school. If they do know and trust the adults, seeing them on the streets makes them feel more safe.
A front door that has been boarded up indicates to students that something has happened at that location which causes feeling of unease.
Stores only serve as a place students would trust to seek help if they already have a relationship with the owner or an employee.

 

 

 

Collab Lab 12 Recap & Notes

Middle School Math – What should we be trying?

Yesterday’s Collab Lab was a joint effort with Milwaukee Succeeds.  We pulled together a small group focused on middle school math– what factors lead to student success and what gets in the way.  We’ll reconvene the group in October as they work as a cohort to implement the strategies we discussed. Notes from our session are below.

If you’d like to participate in a Math cohort like this, please let us know:

    I'd like to... (required)
    ParticipateSupport the effort

    A visual recap of the discussion from Collab Lab 12 on middle school math.

    Contributing Factors

    Strategies

    High quality instruction*

    • Procedural vs. conceptual knowledge
    • Real world application
    • Productive struggle
    • Engaging/interactive content
    • Project based learning
    • Teacher approach
    • Facilitating math discourse/connections
    • Culturally responsive practices
    • Clear objectives
    • Small group instruction
    • Student-centered
    • Differentiation
    • Student goal setting

    Committed leadership*

    Teacher support (coaching/mentoring)

    Culture of taking risks and experimentation

    Parent engagement/advocacy/attitude

    Curricula

    Common Core State Standards

    Cross-sector collaboration and best practice sharing

    Math enrichment programs

    • Coding

    Growth Mindset of principals, teachers, parents, and students

    Role models mirror students

    Increase discourse in math class

    • Begin math discourse in early grades
    • Track student responses to ensure equity
    • Provide wait time
    • Try “Bounce back”
    • Use “Turn and talk”
    • “I notice, I wonder” stems
    • Pose open ended questions
    • Setting up the physical space to promote discussion

    Build committed leadership

    • Brookhill (One day PD to show quality instruction)
    • Schools That Can Milwaukee

    Predict where students may struggle and set them up for success

    Continued Learning for teachers:

     Hindering Factors

    Student and/or teacher fixed mindset*

    Teacher content knowledge

    Math licensure

    Communication/language barrier

    ACEs

    Curricula

    • Low quality
    • Lacks rigor
    • Frequent changes
    • Lacks cultural responsiveness

    No K-12 math scope and sequence within schools, districts, and/or the city

    Metrics can be misleading

    • Emphasis on certain metrics (standardized tests or STAR)
    • Alignment between curricula and assessments
    • Data not triangulated

    Teacher evaluations

    Prior school experiences of students

    Student motivation

    Challenges at home

    Students living in poverty

    Reliance on computer instruction

    Prior school experiences of adults

    Lack of resources in the classroom

    • Technology
    • Materials

    Absence of early interventions

    “Tracking” students

    Key:

    Items discussed by the group
    Items that were noted but not discussed
    * designates strong support around the factor

    Collab Lab 11 Recap & Notes

    We held our final Collab Lab for the 2016-17 school year on Thursday June 15th, where the topic for the evening was “Creating a culture of innovation in schools”.

    We prompted the discussion with three questions:

    • What does a culture of innovation look like?
    • What stands in the way?
    • How can you create one anyway?

    Our notes from the evening are below.  Thanks again to all who were able to join us.  It was a great group and a really interesting set of conversations!

    Big Ideas

    • Innovation (continuous improvement) works in a system that instills a feeling of safety and encourages risk taking as a dedicated team.
    • Look for cross disciplinary problems that have meaning for students
    • Permission from the top for bottom up innovation
    • Autonomy allows bright spots which can then spread
    • Culture needs to come from school leadership
    • Use the right metrics
    • Start with what inspires the student

    What does a culture of innovation look like?

    • Inquisitive
    • Focused risk taking
    • Failure is ok — fail forward
    • Collaboration
    • High engagement
    • interesting/fun
    • Student ownership of learning
    • Authentic
    • Healthy level of trust within the organization
    • Involvement
    • Empathetic
    • Public — welcomes feedback
    • There is a purpose and time for innovation
    • Innovation days — re-energizes staff
    • Hackathons — new products/committed block of time
    • Everyone drinks the Kool Aid
    • Encourage the design process
    • Inquirey
    • Opportunistic
    • Curiosity
    • What education means
    • Innovation is a value & aspiration, it does not equal effeciancy
    • One can innovate around people, process, technology
    • Leverage other resources, get kids involved
    • Cross domains
    • Power to the edge
    • Teams w/autonomy w/in safety construct
    • What is the smallest thing to start w/to start a feedback loop
    • Autonomy “fails” all the time– acknowledge failure, know it, work past it.
    • More difficult/important problems typically get less $$, time, resources
    • Teachers develop understanding about what’s happening in industry

     

    What stands in the way

    • Taxpayer expectations
    • Teacher training
    • Uncertain ROI
    • Implementation Fidelity
    • Not everyone is innovative
    • It’s tough socially to be an innovator
    • Building (e.g. school) climate
    • Schools are structured to resist change
    • Mental models (of what school should look like)
    • Expectations of students, teachers
    • We train to technology rather problem solving/leadership
    • Are we selling it well?
    • Structure — no time to see what else is out there/what is possible
    • Scaling 35 x 5
    • It’s a big ledge to jump off of
    • Lack of courage to go off script
    • Lack “well functioning” partnerships w/industry
    • Those in charge of designing the system impact the level innovation capability
    • [Feeling that] “we’re looking good already”
    • Parents

     

    How can you create one anyway?

    • Play to strengths
    • Give permission
    • Visit other rooms/schools
    • Use different metrics:
      • Engagement
      • 21st century skills
    • Focus on problems that matter to kids
    • Start with problems in school
    • Find a one off opportunity and then do it again
    • Show that it is valued by school/district leadership
    • Ask for something small at first
    • Transparency– get ahead of perception
    • Start as elective then tie into curriculum
    • Look for bright spots
    • Focus on interest in problems and who students need
    • Acknowledge self discovery
    • Leadership action
    • Organize PLCs
    • Align goals w/innovative initiatives
    • Focus on the real problem
    • Assemble the right people
    • Incentivise problem solving
    • Create a “Vision of the graduate”

     

    Collab Lab 10 Recap

    Building Resilience

    Over the course of our Collab Labs this year, we’ve often heard that well crafted, collaborative, authentic learning experience provide students a safe place to fail and recover and through that, build resilience.  At Collab Lab 10, we focused on resilience directly, asking the following questions:

    • What do you see that worries you?
    • What drives that behavior?
    • What strategies do you use to overcome that?

    Our discussions ranged from students dealing with trauma to those who’s main source of stress is continual pressure to perform at a high level.

    Sheri Marlin from the Waters Foundation was able to join us again, and provided a couple of causal loop diagrams as part of our reflection at the end of the session:

    • Trust/Resilience : Increased levels of trust lead to increased resilience. Increased resilience leads to an increased ability to trust.
    • Environment/Resilience: A supportive environment leads to increased resilience. Increased resilience helps create a more supportive environment for others

    As part of the wrap up, Lori Lange from Beloit Memorial High School shared the story of the laundry program she put together to develop the capacities of special ed students and help address a basic need of those that are economically disadvantaged.  It’s a great story of students working together to build resilience. You can read more here: https://beloitschools.org/loads-to-success/

    Thanks to all of our participants for joining us for another great evening of discussion. Notes from our breakout groups are below.

    Group 1

    What do you see that worries you?

    • Wandering halls — unfocused
    • So focused on discipline that there is no self-discipline
    • Focus on trauma misses developing resilience
    • Adults losing their ability to be resilient in front of kids
    • Absence of consequences
    • Compassion fatigue
    • How to teach it?
    • Reactive — social norm is don’t worry until it is too late
    • Kids have to stay in resilience mode constantly
    • Trauma — complexity of trauma/lack of support systems
    • What do you “bounce back” to?
    • Facade of perfection (self told stories)

    What drives (resilient) behavior?

    • Resilience is a muscle
    • Adapting
    • Knowing when to use strategies
    • Survival instinct
    • Past failure and recovery
    • Self talk – resilient people have a unique ability to control thoughts, beliefs and attitudes
    • Good support — relationships — trust
    • Mentoring — modeling — role models
    • Infant bonding
    • Coping vs resilience
      • peer pressure
      • fate?
      • social norms
      • unexpected change
    • Reading history
    • Perspective
    • Family stories (immigration)
    • Exposure — expectation — hope — dreaming
    • Knowing healthy ways to cope
    • Sense of constancy
    • Diet — sleep — routine
    • Purpose
    • Faith

    What strategies do you use to overcome that?

    • Develop a common understanding of resilience
      • from ambiguous to concrete
    • Self discovery
    • Providing experiences — not teaching “it”
    • Pedagogy of confidence– building on students’ life stories
      • “Learning to Walk” — “trial and learn”
    • Design thinking
      • providing experience
      • healthy risk taking vs risk adverse
    • Catching kids being resilience — name it
    • Creating safe space — language
    • Trusting relationships — time/space
    • Community
      • multi-age interactions
    • Perspectives
      • avoid over managing
      • discovery
      • sharing experiences
    • Modeling mentoring
    • Re-teach coping strategies
    • Remove barriers to healthy coping strategies
    • Brave space vs safe space
    • Accountability/Voice

    Group 2

    What do you see that worries you?

    • Lack of understanding of level of stress
    • We don’t use failure as a teaching tool
      • “You didn’t fail, you are just not there yet!”
    • Life events – conflict at home/in community
    • Meet people’s basic needs (kids →families)
      • not happening
      • laundry program (in Beloit HS to meet that need)
    • No emergency room for mental health
    • Increased occurrence of trauma among youth
    • Rigidity of the classroom
    • Lack of connection/dependable suppport
    • Teacher burnout
    • Lack of purpose in life

    What drives that (worrisome) behavior?

    • Institutional roadblocks
      • teachers can do it anyway with leadership support
    • Erosion of supports
    • Culture
      • preconceived notions
      • us vs them
      • political climate
    • Structural poverty
    • Violence as a taught behavior
    • Food desert
    • State pressure on school districts to perform
    • State testing!
    • Parent expectations
    • incarceration of minority men

    What Strategies do you use to overcome that?

    • Bike program
    • Boundary program
    • Mental health clinic in the school (may cause problems at home)
    • Empowerment
      • resources access
      • break through co-dependency
    • Peer examples/role models
    • Student ownership of changing one’s circumstances
    • Separating by gender
      • break through stereotypes (STEM)
    • Trauma informed care at the school
      • reduce expulsion numbers
    • Teach children to rely on each other
    • Build context to relate to in “why” decisions
    • Accommodate different learning styles

    Group 3

    What do you see that worries you?

    • Lack of motivation (students, parents, teachers)
    • Unhealthy coping — cutting
    • Kindness is getting lost (cooperation/caring)
    • Inability to connect
    • Lack of history/common experience
    • Disconnect from culture
    • Frustration with how to reach kids
      • How to connect
    • Self validation vs validation from others
    • Inequity
    • Lack of caring for kids
    • Sense that no one cares/I am heard
    • Sadness/anxiety
    • Kids don’t move
    • Integration of social/emotional health
    • Relevance– lack experience/context

    What drives that (worrisome) behavior?

    • Lack of skills/understanding
    • Parents are lost
    • Use of social media
    • Sitting all day for classes
    • Liability of going out on a limb
    • Teachers lack skills for trauma informed care
    • Teacher/students from different cultures
    • Empathy fatigue
    • Who can I ask for help
    • Teachers are forced to triage
    • Parents don’t value education
    • Too much stress in personal life
    • Survival — all I see is failure
    • Pressure for material goods
    • Divorce — parents are overworked
      • single moms working 2-3 jobs
    • Kids aren’t safe alone
    • Lack of opportunities to fail well
    • Low expectations
    • Parents in survival mode
    • Mismatch between teacher evaluations and what is important (to do for students)
    • Kids pushed through system
    • Grades
    • Fear of talking about emotions

    What strategies do you use to overcome that?

    • Mindfulness
    • PBIS (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports)
    • 4 days of instruction, 1 day job embed
    • Bring awareness of trauma
    • Awareness of different situations
    • Support from outside to take the load off of teachers
    • Understand why students struggle
    • Use research — let kids experience failure
    • Alternative evaluations
    • Exercise/physical activity
    • Community service
    • Policies adapt to community
    • Self care/set boundaries
      • start early
    • Care of others/empathy
    • Building community
    • Having system support

    Makerspace Challenge: Pitch Night

    Makerspace ChallengeTuesday was pitch night at 88.9 for The Commons. The Betty Brinn/Learn Deep team shared their vision of CSA-farm-box meets up-cycling. The solution looks to offer schools a subscription service that delivers a mystery box of materials for use in a makerspace on a monthly basis.  Great idea, go team!

    We have an idea on how to make this happen in Milwaukee. If you’re interested, let us know.

     

      Recap: MJDS Innovation Hub tour

      Tour Q & A
      Questions from participants on the wall of the Big Idea Room.

      A big thanks to Brian King for opening up the MJDS Innovation Hub for our visit and willingness to entertain all questions that could fit on the wall.

      Thanks also to Quentin Allums from Mad Genie who came out before the tour with his 360° camera.  Quentin showed a group of MJDS students how to capture still and video images for video and VR and with some occasional advise, turned them loose to capture the Innovation Hub.  A first look at what they produced is here:

       

      Collab Lab 9 Recap & Notes

      Collab Lab 9 360 Selfie
      360 Selfie under the guidance of Quentin Allums at the close of Collab Lab 9

      Collab Lab 9 focused on evaluating success of makerspaces and FabLabs.  We used three questions to guide the discussion:

      • What does success look like?
      • What makes it difficult to assess?
      • How can those barriers be addressed?

      Our discussion groups came up with these three big ideas to take home:

      • We have to learn to be comfortable with failure (and willing to model it for our students).
      • Makerspaces are a tool for developing a mindset
      • Successful makerspaces are the definition of individualized learning — teachers have the opportunity for one on one interaction with students, students are able to follow their passions.

      And as a bonus: If students aren’t having fun, you aren’t there yet.


      Links to things people heard about at Collab Lab 9:

      April 20th: Tour of Milwaukee Jewish Day School’s Innovation Hub

      April 27th: Betty Brinn’s Making in Education Community of Practice

      May 11th: Collab Lab 10: Building Resilience

      NEXT.cc: NEXT.cc supports making across the curriculum with STEAM based project learning set to NEXT Generation Science, Art & Design, and North American Association for Environmental Education Standards.  Scaffolding cognitive learning with discovery, NEXT.cc’s eLearning DESIGNopiedia introduces skills and integrates K12 classrooms with apps, virtual field trips, TEDed courses, free data sets, mapping, and science interactives bringing our youth into the future of lifelong learning.

      21st Century Classrooms
      Outdoor Classrooms
      Makerspaces

      Mark Keane’s architecture classes for high school students:

      Draw to Build I & II
      UWM SARUP now offers two dual enrollment Architecture courses for juniors and seniors in high school.  They can be accessed via Youth Options or PLA. Contact Prof. Keane for more information: keane@uwm.edu.  Here’s a brief piece on the course featuring Collab Lab attendee Cindy McClinn and her students: http://uwm.edu/news/area-students-explore-architecture-100-and-perhaps-a-career/


      Notes from breakout groups:

      Group 1: We have to learn to be comfortable with failure (and willing to model it for our students)

      What does success look like?

      Dewy — Congnition — Metacognition
      Mistakes & Failure
      Outputs:  What does it look like? What does it sound like?
      Growth Mindset
      Common Process
      Audience?
      Economic?
      Engagement

      What makes it difficult to assess?

      Teacher/Educator thinking
      Tasks — What is authenticity?
      Standardization
      Questions are unwelcome
      Grade based system
      Lack of experience with failure/open tasks
      Kids are trained to think about school in “school” ways
      Behaviorist vs Constructivist

      How can those barriers be addressed?

      Common processes
      Digital modeling
      Community involvement
      What is making?
      Hope
      Culture
      Expertise

      Group 2: Makerspaces are a tool for developing a mindset

      What does success look like?

      Passion for a career path
      Meaningful collaboration
      Focused engagement on task
      Problem solving
      Equality of ideas/contributions
      Success is nurtured and progressive
      Teachers as facilitators & learners
      Learning through experimentation
      High level of resilience to change
      Authentic experiences
      Makerspaces is a process/culture
      Fun
      Futuring

      What makes it difficult to assess?

      Traditional buildings
      Lack of exposure/access to tech
      “Accounting mindset” of leadership
      How do I manage the learning process?
      How do I track learning that takes place 24 x 7?
      Gather the info that leadership needs
      Kids don’t know how to self-assess/be accountable for their learning
      There is not time to teach anything that doesn’t lead to a 22 on the ACT
      Don’t know how to reach outside businesses for real higher level learning
      Parents
      Teacher education is not continuous and focused on designing engaging project opportunities
      Tine to do something other than standardized tests

       

      Group 3: Successful makerspaces are the definition of individualized learning — teachers have the opportunity for one on one interaction with students, students are able to follow their passions

      What does success look like?

      Start with purpose– of the space; of the school
      For who?  Student, teacher, school, community
      Attendance up
      Increased engagement– students and teachers
      Growth
      Leadership
      Curiosity is sparked
      Students (and teachers) are not afraid to fail
      Becomes part of the culture of the the school/community
      It is demonstrated
      Craftsmanship
      Ability to transfer and apply the skills learned
      Hit high standards
      Process
      Finding one’s self
      Be able to adapt/be responsible
      Kids set their own expectations
      Compliance does not equal success
      Integrated with curriculum
      Other teachers are comfortable using the space
      Students understand how to be life long learners
      Teachers have an individual connection with students
      Fun

      What makes it difficult to assess?

      Who is asking– district, school, parent, student
      Subjective
      Individualized
      Long time frame required to see the results
      Figuring out what is important
      Pressure for standardized testing
      Students are handed off to someone else (for the makerspace work)
      Changing expectations
      Getting teachers to adopt a new role– mentor/guide

      How can those barriers be addressed?

      Agreement on what you want to see happen
      Ask how the community can help
      Ask students for self evaluations
      Classroom teachers should work with students within a makerspace (rather than handing them off)
      Show off the results of student efforts

      Makerspace Challenge: Thinking Through a Solution

      Last night at The Commons, the Betty Brinn/Learn Deep team pinned down a persona for their beachhead customer– now known as “Steve” who manages the makerspace for an area school. The key problems faced by Steve:

      • “I don’t always know where to go to get the materials I need.”
      • “It takes a lot of time to track down where to find supplies (if I don’t already know where to get them).”
      • “I have to pick up everything myself.”
      • “I have to do this for all of the teachers that want to use my makerspace.”
      • “At times, I want to be inspired by the material (so I don’t know what I want until I can see and touch it)”.

      The team was able to use that set of problems to filter the ideas generated last week to just those that addressed these key issues.  It also led to the creation of a second persona — “Orlando”, who has excess material, but also,his own problems to solve:

      • “I have usable stuff that now costs me money to dispose of”
      • “I don’t know who would want what I hope to get rid of”
      • “I don’t like the fact that my scrap ends up in a landfill”
      • “I worry about liability issues if others come on-site to sift through my scrap to take what is of use to them.”

      This week’s work:  Confirm the assumptions about the problems faced by Orlando, and clarify the vision for a potential solution– what’s the minimum viable product, and what might it look like when fully realized?

       

      2024-25 Collab Labs

      Skip to content
      Verified by MonsterInsights